<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hyper Dog Denver SEO Blog &#124; Colorado SEO Firm &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Denver, Colorado SEO &#124; Web Development Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s new &#8220;Behavioral Targeting&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/12/31/microsofts-new-behavioral-targeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/12/31/microsofts-new-behavioral-targeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC (Pay Per Click)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/12/31/microsofts-new-behavioral-targeting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is increasing personalizing ads given to it&#8217;s users. Microsoft says privacy is kept intact, and advertisers using Microsoft&#8217;s new Adcenter Pay-Per-Click(PPC) service are indeed seeing higher click-through rates(CTR). So, what&#8217;s the problem? It sounds like a win-win, and behavioral targeting will certainly be seen with increasing emphasis at Google AdWords, Yahoo Search Marketing and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Microsoft is increasing personalizing ads" href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06361/749452-96.stm">Microsoft is increasing personalizing ads</a> given to it&#8217;s users. Microsoft says privacy is kept intact, and advertisers using Microsoft&#8217;s new Adcenter Pay-Per-Click(PPC) service are indeed seeing higher click-through rates(CTR). So, what&#8217;s the problem? It sounds like a win-win, and behavioral targeting will certainly be seen with increasing emphasis at Google AdWords, Yahoo Search Marketing and other PPC advertising providers.</p>
<p>In a discussion of the article on Slashdot.org, one user writes:<br />
Microsoft and friends are going to push ads at us either way, I would just as soon see ads for stuff that I am actually interested in. When I go to a store and the salesman knows me well enough to actually be helpful I chalk that up to good service. Why should a website be any different?</p>
<p>Has anyone noticed the behavior targeted ads &#8211; rolled out in September in the United States? Do you prefer them? Let us know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/12/31/microsofts-new-behavioral-targeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic Voting Machines: More troubles</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/09/13/electronic-voting-machines-more-troubles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/09/13/electronic-voting-machines-more-troubles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/09/13/electronic-voting-machines-more-troubles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Maryland, the electronic voting machines were inoperable when polling places opened. It was human error, though: Plastic wallet sized cards needed ro operate the machines were forgotten and a scramble ensued. By the end of the day, election workers had voters casting on scraps of paper, sealed inside envelopes purchased at the local pharmacy. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Maryland, the electronic voting machines were inoperable when polling places opened. It was human error, though: Plastic wallet sized cards needed ro operate the machines were forgotten and <a title="Maryland electronic polling problems" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/12/AR2006091200535.html">a scramble ensued</a>. By the end of the day, election workers had voters casting on scraps of paper, sealed inside envelopes purchased at the local pharmacy. Despite the cases of security issues(<a title="Diebold machine hacked by a monkey" href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133214,00.html">once hacked by a monkey?!</a>), electronic voting is here to stay. Unfortunately, it seems the machines are being phased in too quickly &#8211; without the necessary fallbacks to paper balloting systems when needed. Track the latest issues during the primaries at <a target="_blank" title="Diebold electronic voting issues" href="http://www.blackboxvoting.org/">www.blackboxvoting.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperdogmedia.com/blog/2006/09/13/electronic-voting-machines-more-troubles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

